Home DE ES FR


Advanced Search

Our On-Line PhDs

Submit a Thesis
My Account Register Help

About
Fields
Mathematics and Applications
Information and Communication Sciences and Technologies
Physics, Optics
Materials Science, Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering
Fluid Mechanics and Energy
Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Life Sciences and Engineering
Earth Sciences and Environmental Engineering
Sciences of Economy, Management and Society
Distributive Justice: Individuals' Beliefs, Judgements and Choices.

Boarini, Romina (2004) Distributive Justice: Individuals' Beliefs, Judgements and Choices. PhD thesis CECO, EP - CECO Laboratoire d'Econometrie, EP/X p.230.

Full text not available from this repository.

Licence: Copyright

Alternative Locations: http://www.imprimerie.polytechnique.fr/Theses/Files/boarini.pdf

Abstract

This work consists of a collectio! n of empirical studies about distributive justice. The object of the work is to study individuals’ views on how scarce resources should be distributed in the society. Individuals’ preferences are either elicited as beliefs and judgments or observed as behaviors in a number of distributive contexts. We are both interested in revealing the individuals’ conceptions of justice and in understanding the rationales behind distributive choices. In the first part, we study the entitlement to priority rights in the context of trasferts between generations (bequests and retirement) and in the context of health care. The framework used in the second part deals with situations where a trade-off exists between one’s own private interest and the others’ one. In particular, this trade-off is analysed with respect to the issue of redistributive public policies and in a context of bargaining occurring between agents with asymetric claims. Throughout we assume that individuals take distributive decisions or express distributional judgments, by taking into consideration broader reasons than their personal material interest. We consider more specifically fairness and reciprocity rationales. The assumptions are validated through empirical evidence.

Item Type:PhD Thesis (PhD)
Thesis Supervisor:Laslier, Jean-François
Date:April 2004
Board of examiners:Fleurbaey, Marc and Merlin, Vincent and Mongin, Philippe and Ruffieux, Bernard and Schokkaert, Erik
Ecole Doctorale:ED 447 ECOLE DOCTORALE DE L'ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE
Discipline:CECO
Collection (Fonds):EP/X
Institution:EP/X
Department:EP - CECO Laboratoire d'Econometrie
Subjects:9. Sciences of Economy, Management and Society
Uncontrolled Keywords:Distributive justice, Models of social preferences, Experimental economics, Justice distributive, Modeles de préférences sociales, économie expérimentale

Table of content

SOMMAIRE
1. Introduction - 1
2. Les apports de la thèse - 13
Chapitre I : Choosing Impartially - 25
Chapitre II : Les conséquences de la malchance sont-elles injustes ? - 49
Chapitre III : What people think is the ‘just’ distribution of health care ? (Co-écrit avec Peter Martinsson) - 81
Chapitre IV : Should Age matter in Life Saving Programs ?Empirical Results from India and Sweden. (Co-écrit avec Peter Martinsson) - 123
Chapitre V : Social Preferences on Public Intervention: an Empirical Study. (Co-écrit avec Christine Le Clainche) - 159
Chapitre VI : Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility in Bargaining: Evidence from a Transcontinental Ultimatum Game. (Co-écrit avec Jean-François Laslier et Stéphane Robin) - 195

ID Code:947
Deposited By:Nadine Garnier
Deposited On:17 December 2004

Statistiques de consultation

Repository Staff Only: edit this item

© ParisTech 2007 - Réalisé par RILK.com - Graphisme par Winch Communication