Accueil DE EN ES FR


Advanced Search

Our On-Line PhDs

Submit a Thesis
My Account Register Help

About
Fields
Mathematics and Applications
Information and Communication Sciences and Technologies
Physics, Optics
Materials Science, Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering
Fluid Mechanics and Energy
Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Life Sciences and Engineering
Earth Sciences and Environmental Engineering
Sciences of Economy, Management and Society
Modelisation and estimation of heterogeneous variances in nonlinear mixed models

Duval, Mylene (2008) Modelisation and estimation of heterogeneous variances in nonlinear mixed models. PhD thesis Mathématiques appliquées , INRA - SAGA, AgroParistech 2008AGPT0082 p.186.

Full text available as:

- manuscrit_duval.pdf ( 1740 Kb )
Licence: Copyright

Abstract

Nonlinear mixed models stand apart in mixed models methodology. Contrary to linear

and generalized linear models, often used as black boxes, the trajectory function t in

nonlinear models generally comes from the integration of dierential equations. This

provides a biological interpretation for the parameters, whereas models are often more

parsimonious. However, the estimation of the parameters in nonlinear mixed models is

complex because random eects cannot be integrated out of the likelihood in closed form.

As in all mixed models, especially those used to analyze longitudinal data, nonlinear models

are well adapted to take into account between and within-cluster variation. However,

one of the common assumptions of such models is that of independent, identically distributed

residuals with a common variance; this assumption is unrealistic in many elds

of applications.

The objective of this study was to propose some models for the residual variance to take

into account the potential heterogeneity of variance of the residuals, while limiting the

number of parameters in these models. In this sense, we used a parametric approach

based on a linear mixed model on the logvariance, as well as the classical power \meanvariance"

function.

A classical inference method based on maximum likelihood theory was selected and we

considered a stochastic EM algorithm, the SAEM-MCMC algorithm. The mixed model

structure applied to the position and dispersion parameters is well adapted to the implementation

of EM algorithms. Some instrumental distributions adapted to the analysis

of these models, as well as some convergence criteria, were proposed in the MCMC step.

The overall algorithm was numerically validated in both linear and nonlinear models, by

comparing its results with those of an analytical EM algorithm (in the linear case) or

other algorithms like those based on Gaussian quadrature.

Finally, an application to the analysis of somatic cell scores in dairy cattle was presented.

Several linear and nonlinear models were compared showing a clear gain obtained taking

into account the heterogeneity of variances.

Item Type:PhD Thesis (PhD)
PhD Supervisor:Foulley, Jean-Louis and Robert-Granié, Christèle
Date:08 December 2008
Board of examiners:Verrier, Etienne and Concordet, Didier and Parent, Eric and Samson, Adeline
Ecole Doctorale:ED 435 AGRICULTURE, ALIMENTATION, BIOLOGIE, ENVIRONNEMENTS ET SANTE
Discipline:Mathématiques appliquées
Collection (Fonds):AgroParistech
Institution:AgroParistech
Department:INRA - SAGA
Subjects:1. Mathematics and Applications
Uncontrolled Keywords:Modèles mixtes non linéaires, Hétéroscédasticité, Vraisemblance, algorithme SAEM, Nonlinear mixed models, Heteroskedasticity, Ikelihood, SAEM algorithm
ID Code:4846
Deposited By:Mylene Duval
Deposited On:09 April 2009

Table of content

1 Modèles non linéaires mixtes et variances hétérogènes : éléments bibliographiques 21

1.1 Les modèles non linéaires mixtes - 21

1.1.1 Les applications - 21

1.1.2 Les modèles - 26

1.2 Variances hétérogènes : existence et modélisation - 29

1.2.1 Existence des variances hétérogènes - 29

1.2.2 Modélisation des variances résiduelles - 31

1.3 Méthodes d'estimation dans les modèles non linéaires à effets mixtes - 34

1.3.1 Méthodes de linéarisation de la vraisemblance - 35

1.3.2 Méthodes basées sur la théorie du maximum de vraisemblance . . . 37

1.3.3 Algorithme basée sur une pseudo vraisemblance - 42

1.3.4 Méthodes bayésiennes - 42

2 Quelques critéres pour calibrer les paramêtres de l'algorithme SAEM-

MCMC 45

2.1 Introduction - 48

2.2 The nonlinear mixed effects model and the SAEM-MCMC algorithm . . . 48

2.2.1 The model - 48

2.2.2 The SAEM-MCMC algorithm - 49

2.2.3 The Metropolis-Hastings algorithm - 51

2.2.4 Estimations of the log-likelihood and standard errors - 51

2.3 The criteria - 52

2.4 Application and simulation - 54

2.5 Discussion - Conclusion - 57

2.6 Acknowledgment - 58

2.7 References - 58

3 Modélisation et estimation des variances hétérogènes dans les modèles

non linéaires mixtes 67

3.1 Introduction - 70

3.2 The heteroskedastic nonlinear mixed Model - 71

3.3 A monitored SAEM-MCMC algorithm - 72

3.3.1 Computation of the ML estimations - 72

3.3.2 Estimations of the log-likelihood and standard errors - 74

3.4 Numerical applications - 75

3.4.1 Validation on a linear model: Potho and Roy's data - 75

3.4.2 Application to a non linear mixed model : growth curves in poultry 76

3.5 Discussion - Conclusion - 78

3.6 References - 80

3.7 Appendix - 82

3.7.1 The Metropolis-Hastings algorithm - 82

3.7.2 Some criteria to calibrate the parameters of the SAEM-MCMC algorithm

- 82

3.7.3 Parameters of the SAEM-MCMC algorithm used in Potho and

Roy's data analysis - 83

4 Application : modéliser les cinétiques de scores de cellules somatiques

chez les bovins laitiers 91

4.1 Introduction - 91

4.2 Matériel et Méthodes - 93

4.2.1 Les données - 93

4.2.2 Le modèle statistique - 93

4.2.3 Méthode d'estimation - 96

4.2.4 Sélection de modèles - 97

4.3 Résultats - 100

4.3.1 Etape 1 : Choix des meilleurs modèles linéaire et non linéaire homogènes - 100

4.3.2 Etape 2 : Déterminer les effets fixes et aléatoires de la fonction

moyenne - 101

4.3.3 Etape 3 : Sélection des covariables sur le vecteur moyenne - 102

4.3.4 Etape 4 : Choix du modèle de variance résiduelle - 103

4.3.5 Etapes 5 : Choix des covariables pour les paramêtres des fonctions

de variances [V4] et [V5] - 104

4.4 Discussion et conclusion - 105

Statistiques de consultation

Repository Staff Only: edit this item

© ParisTech 2007 - Réalisé par RILK.com - Graphisme par Winch Communication