Accueil DE EN ES FR


Advanced Search

Our On-Line PhDs

Submit a Thesis
My Account Register Help

About
Fields
Mathematics and Applications
Information and Communication Sciences and Technologies
Physics, Optics
Materials Science, Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering
Fluid Mechanics and Energy
Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Life Sciences and Engineering
Earth Sciences and Environmental Engineering
Sciences of Economy, Management and Society
Statistical learning, shape manifolds and applications to image segmentation

Etyngier, Patrick (2008) Statistical learning, shape manifolds and applications to image segmentation. PhD thesis, ENPC p.210.

Full text available as:

- 2008-PatrickEtyngier.pdf ( 10859 Kb )
Licence: Copyright

Abstract

Image segmentation with shape priors has received a lot of attention over the past few years. Most existing work focuses on a linearized shape space with small deformation modes around a mean shape, which is only relevant when considering similar shapes. In this thesis, we introduce a new framework that can handle more general shape priors. We model a category of shapes as a finite dimensional manifold, the shape prior manifold, which we analyze from the shape samples using dimensionality reduction techniques such as diffusion maps. An embedding function is then learned from the manifold. Unfortunately, this model does not provide an explicit projection operator onto the underlying shape manifold, and therefore, our work tackles this problem. Our solution is threefold. First, we propose different solutions to the out-of-sample problem and define three attracting forces directed towards the manifold. These forces can be used as projection operators onto the manifold:

² Projection towards the closest point

² Projection with the same embedding

² Projection at constant embedding Next, we introduce a shape prior term for the active contours/regions framework through a non-linear energy term designed to attract shapes towards the manifold. Finally, we describe a variational framework for manifold denoising. Results with real objects such as car silhouettes or anatomical structures show the potential of our method.

Item Type:PhD Thesis (PhD)
PhD Supervisor:Keriven, Renaud
Date:21 January 2008
Board of examiners:Ayache, Nicolas and Cremers, Daniel and Deriche, Rachid and Dibos, Françoise and Thirion, Bertrand and Keriven, Renaud
Collection (Fonds):Ecole des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC)
Institution:ENPC
Subjects:1. Mathematics and Applications
Uncontrolled Keywords:Formes, Variété, Apprentissage, Segmentation, A priori, Ensemble de niveaux, Shape, Manifold, Learning, Segmentation, Prior, Level set
ID Code:4040
Deposited By:Anna Egea
Deposited On:18 July 2008

References

[1] Rolf Adams and Leanne Bischof. Seeded region growing. IEEE Transaction Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence, 16(6):641–647, 1994. 4.2.2

[2] Adini Adini, Yael Moses, and Shimon Ullman. Face recognition: The problem of compensating for changes in illumination direction. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(7), 1997. 6.1.2

[3] Alberto S. Aguado, Eugenia Montiel, and Mark S. Nixon. On the intimate relationship between the principle of duality and the hough transform. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, A-456:503–526, 2000. A.2.1

[4] Omar Ait-Aider, Philippe Hoppenot, and Etienne Colle. Adaptation of lowe’s camera pose recovery algorithm to mobile robot self-localisation. Robotica, 20(4):385–393, 2002. A.1

[5] Cédric Allène, Jean-Yves Audibert, Michel Couprie, Jean Cousty, and Renaud Keriven. Some links between min-cuts, optimal spanning forests and watersheds. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Mathematical Morphology, 2007. 4.2.2

[6] Adnan Ansar and Konstantinos Daniilidis. Linear pose estimation from points or lines. In ECCV ’02: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Computer Vision-Part IV, pages 282–296, London, UK, 2002. SpringerVerlag. A.3.3

[7] Ben Appleton and Hugues Talbot. Globally optimal geodesic active contours. Journal of Mathematics and Imaging Vision, 23(1):67–86, 2005. 4.3.3

[8] Pablo Arias, Gregory Randall, and Guillermo Sapiro. Connecting the outof-sample and pre-image problems in kernel methods. In IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 18-23 jun 2007. 7.1.1, 7.2

[9] Nachman Aronszajn. Theory of reproducing kernels. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 68(3):337–404, 1950. 5.1.2, 5.1.2

[10] Jean-Yves Audibert. PAC-Bayesian Statistical Learning Theory. PhD thesis, Université Paris 6, Francec, Jul 2004. A.3.2, A.3.2, A.8

[11] Jean-Francois Aujol and Gilles Aubert. Signed distance functions and viscosity solutions of discontinuous hamilton-jacobi equations. Research Report 4507, Inria, France, July 2002. 3.2.3

[12] F.R. Bach. Active learning for misspecified generalized linear models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 19, 2006. 6.1.1

[13] Eric Bardinet, Laurent D. Cohen, and Nicolas Ayache. Tracking and motion analysis of the left ventricle with deformable superquadrics. Medical Image Analysis, 1(2), 1996. also INRIA Research Report RR-2797, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, February 1996. 3.2.3

[14] Simon A. Barker. Image Segmentation using Markov Random Field Models. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Signal Processing and Communications Larboratory, Department of Engineering, July 1998. 4.2.2

[15] Mikhail Belkin and Partha Niyogi. Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. Neural Computation, 15(6):1373–1396, 2003. 1.3, 2.3, 5.3, 5.3.1, 5.3.4, 5.4, 6.3

[16] Mikhail Belkin and Partha Niyogi. Semi-supervised learning on manifolds. Machine Learning, 56:209–239, 2004. 6.1.2, 6.3

[17] Yoshua Bengio, Jean-Francois Paiement, Pascal Vincent, Olivier Delalleau, Nicolas Le Roux, and Marie Ouimet. Out-of-sample extensions for lle, isomap, mds, eigenmaps, and spectral clustering. In Sebastian Thrun, Lawrence K. Saul, and Bernhard Schölkopf, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2004. 7.1.1

[18] Serge Beucher. Sets, partitions and functions interpolations. In ISMM ’98: Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on Mathematical mor- phology and its applications to image and signal processing, pages 307– 314, Norwell, MA, USA, 1998. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 3.4.3

[19] Serge Beusher and Christian Lantuejoul. Use of watershed in contour detection. In International Workshop in Image Processing, Real-time Edge and Motion Detection/Estimation, Rennes, France, September 1979. 4.2.2

[20] J. Ross Beveridge, Joey S. Griffith, Ralf R. Kohler, Allen R. Hanson, and Edward M. Riseman. Segmenting images using localized histograms and region merging. IJCV, 2(3):311–352, January 1989. 4.1, 4.2.2

[21] Prabir Bhattacharya, Azriel Rosenfeld, and Isaac Weiss. Point-to-line mappings as hough transforms. Pattern Recognition Letter, 23(14):1705–1710, 2002. A.2.1

[22] Griff Bilbro, Reinhold Mann, Thomas K. Miller, Wesley E. Snyder, David E. Van den Bout, and Mark White. Optimization by mean field annealing. In Advances in neural information processing systems 1, pages 91–98, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1989. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. 4.2.2

[23] Andrew Blake and Andrew Zisserman. Some properties of weak continuity constraints and the gnc algorithm. In CVPR ’86: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 86, pages 656–661. 4.2.2, 4.2.2

[24] Andrew Blake and Andrew Zisserman. Visual Reconstruction. MIT Press, 1987. 4.2.2, 4.2.2

[25] Jean-Daniel Boissonnat and Mariette Yvinec. Algorithmic geometry. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1998. 3.2.2

[26] Gunilla Borgefors. Distance Transformations in Digital Images. Computer Vision, Graphic, and Image Processing, 34:344–371, 1986. 3.2.3

[27] Nozha Boujemaa, Fran¸cois Fleuret, Valérie Gouet, and Hichem Sahbi. Visual content extraction for automatic semantic annotation of video news. In the proceedings of the SPIE Conference, San Jose, CA, 2004. 6.1

[28] Yuri Boykov and Gareth Funka-Lea. Graph cuts and efficient n-d image segmentation. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 70(2):109–131, 2006. 4.2.2

[29] Yuri Boykov and Marie-Pierre Jolly. Interactive graph cuts for optimal boundary & region segmentation of objects in n-d images. In ICCV’01: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, volume 1, pages 105–112, 2001. 4.2.2

[30] Yuri Boykov, Olga Veksler, and Ramin Zabih. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23(11):1222–1239, 2001. 4.2.2

[31] Matthew Brand. Charting a manifold. In Sebastian Thrun, Lawrence Saul, and Bernhard Schölkopf, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2004. 5.4

[32] Matthew Brand. Minimax embeddings. In Sebastian Thrun, Lawrence Saul, and Bernhard Schölkopf, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2004. 5.4

[33] Claude R. Brice and Claude L. Fennema. Scene analysis using regions. Artificial Intelligence, 1(3):205–226, 1970. 4.1, 4.2.2

[34] G. Caenen and E.J. Pauwels. Logistic regression model for relevance feedback in content based image retrieval. In proceedings of SPIE, 4676:49–58, 2002. 6.1.1

[35] John F. Canny. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 8(6):679–698, 1986. 4.1, 4.2.1

[36] Vicent Caselles, Francine Catté, Tomeu Coll, and Francoise Dibos. A geometric model for active contours. Nümerische Mathematik, 66:1–31, 1993. 4.3.3, 4.3.3

[37] Vicent Caselles, Ron Kimmel, and Guillermo Sapiro. Geodesic active coutours. In Fifth IEEE Internation Conference on Computer Vision, pages 694–699, October 1995. 4.3.3, 4.3.3

[38] Tony F. Chan and Luminita A. Vese. Active contours without edges. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 10(2):266–277, 2001. 4.3.3, 4.3.3

[39] Guillaume Charpiat. Shape Statistics for Image Segmentation with Priors. PhD thesis, Ecole Polytechnique, Dec 2006. 3, 3.1, 3.2.1, 3.3.1, 3.4.2, 3.4.2, 3.4.2, 3.4.3

[40] Guillaume Charpiat, Olivier Faugeras, and Renaud Keriven. Approximations of shape metrics and application to shape warping and empirical shape statistics. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 5(1):1–58, 2005. 1.3, 2.3, 3.3.1, 3.3.1, 3.4.2, 3.4.3, 3.4.3, 4.4.2, 7.3.2, 7.3.3, 7.3.3

[41] Y. Chen, X.S. Zhou, and T.S. Huang. One-class svm for learning in image retrieval. Int’l Conf on Image Processing, 2001. 6.1.1

[42] Yunmei Chen, Hemant D. Tagare, Sheshadri Thiruvenkadam, Feng Huang, David Wilson, Kaundinya S. Gopinath, Richard W. Briggs, and Edward A. Geiser. Using prior shapes in geometric active contours in a variational framework. The International Journal of Computer Vision, 50(3):315–328, 2002. 1.3, 2.3, 4.4.2

[43] David L. Chopp. Computing minimal surfaces via level set curvature flow. Journal of Computational Physics, 106:77–91, 1993. 4.3.3, 4.3.3

[44] Stéphane Christy and Radu Horaud. Iterative pose computation from line correspondences. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 73(1):137– 144, January 1999. A.1, A.3.3

[45] Fan R. K. Chung. Spectral Graph Theory (CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, No. 92) (Cbms Regional Conference Series in Mathematics). American Mathematical Society, February 1997. 5.3.2, 5.3.2

[46] Isaac Cohen and Laurent D. Cohen. A hybrid hyperquadric model for 2-D and 3-D data fitting. Research report, INRIA, 1992. 3.2.3

[47] Ronald Coifman, Stéphane Lafon, Ann B. Lee, Mauro Maggioni, Boaz Nadler, Fred Warner, and Steven Zucker. Geometric diffusions as a tool for harmonic analysis and structure definition of data: Diffusion maps. PNAS, 102(21):7426–7431, 2005. 5.3.5, 5.3.5, 7.3.2, 8.3.3

[48] Timothy F. Cootes, Christopher J. Taylor, David H. Cooper, and Jim Graham. Active shape models-their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 61(1):38–59, 1995. 4.4.2

[49] Jose A Costa and Alfred O Hero. Statistics and Analysis of Shapes. H. Krim and A. Yezzi Eds, Springer, chapter Determining Intrinsic Dimension and Entropy of high-Dimensional Shape Spaces. 2006. 5.5

[50] Ingemar J. Cox, Matthew L. Miller, Thomas P. Minka, and Peter N. Yianilos. An optimized interaction strategy for bayesian relevance feedback. CVPR’ 98: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Santa Barbara, California, pages 553–558, 1998. 6.1, 6.1.1

[51] Trevor F. Cox and Michael A. A. Cox. Multidimensional Scaling, Second Edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC, September 2000. 1.1.2, 1.3, 2.1.2, 2.3, 5.2.1

[52] Daniel Cremers. Statistical shape knowledge in variational image segmentation. PhD thesis, University of Mannheim, 2002. 4.3.3

[53] Daniel Cremers, Timo Kohlberger, and Christoph Schnörr. Nonlinear shape statistics in mumford shah based segmentation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 93–108, 2002. 1.3, 2.3, 3.2.2, 4.4.3

[54] Daniel Cremers, Stanley Osher, and Stefano Soatto. Kernel density estimation and intrinsic alignment for knowledge-driven segmentation: Teaching level sets to walk. In C. E. Rasmussen, editor, Pattern Recognition (Proc. DAGM), volume 3175 of LNCS, pages 36–44. Springer, 2004. 3.3.1

[55] Daniel Cremers, Stanley Osher, and Stefano Soatto. Kernel density estimation and intrinsic alignment for shape priors in level set segmentation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 69(3):335–351, September 2006. 4.4.2

[56] Daniel Cremers, Mikael Rousson, and Rachid Deriche. A review statistical approaches to level set segmentation: integrating colors, texture, motion and shape. International Journal of Computer Vision, 72(2):195–215, 1989. 4.3.3

[57] Daniel Cremers, Christoph Schnörr, and Joachim Weickert. Diffusion snakes: Combining statistical shape knowledge and image information in a variational framework. In N. Paragios, editor, IEEE First Int. Workshop on Variational and Level Set Methods, pages 137–144, Vancouver, 2001. 1.2, 2.2

[58] Daniel Cremers, Christoph Schnörr, Joachim Weickert, and Christian Schellewald. Diffusion snakes using statistical shape knowledge. In C. Sommer and Y.Y. Zeevi, editors, Algebraic frames for the perception-action cycle, volume 1888 of LNCS, pages 164–174, Kiel, Germany, Sept. 2000. Springer. 1.2, 2.2

[59] Olivier Cuisenaire. Distance transformations: fast algorithm and applications to medical image processing. PhD thesis, Universitet’ Catholique de Louvain, October 1999. 3.2.3

[60] Samuel Dambreville, Yogesh Rathi, and Allen Tannenbeaum. Shape-based approach to robust image segmentation using kernel pca. In CVPR ’06: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 977–984, 2006. 7.2

[61] Per-Erik Danielsson. Euclidean distance mapping. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 14:227–248, 1980. 3.2.3

[62] Michel C. Delfour and Jean-Paul Zolésio. Shapes and geometries: analysis, differential calculus, and optimization. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2001. 3, 3.1

[63] Hervé Delingette. General object reconstruction based on simplex meshes. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 32(2):111–146, 1999. 3.2.2

[64] Hervé Delingette and Johan Montagnat. Shape and topology constraints on parametric active contours. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 83(2):140–171, August 2001. 3.2.2

[65] Rachid Deriche. Using Canny’s criteria to derive a recursively implemented optimal edge detector. The International Journal of Computer Vision, 1(2):167–187, May 1987. 4.1, 4.2.1

[66] Rachid Deriche and Olivier Faugeras. Tracking line segments. Image and Vision Computing, 8(4):261–270, 1990. A.1

[67] Alain Dervieux and François Thomasset. A finite element method for the simulation of rayleigh-taylor instability. Lecture Notes on Mathematics, (771):145–159, 1979. 3.2.3

[68] Mathieu Desbrun, Mark Meyer, Peter Schröder, and Alan H. Barr. Implicit fairing of irregular meshes using diffusion and curvature flow. Computer Graphics, 33(Annual Conference Series):317–324, 1999. 8.1

[69] Konstantinos I. Diamantaras and Sun Yuan Kung. Principal component neural networks: theory and applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1996. 5.1.1, 5.1.1

[70] David L. Donoho and Carrie Grimes. Hessian eigenmaps: Locally linear embedding techniques for high-dimensional data. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences, 100(10):5591–5596, May 2003. 5.4

[71] Fadi Dornaika and Christophe Garcia. Pose estimation using point and line correspondences. Journal of Real-Time Imaging, Academic Press, 5(3):217– 232, June 1999. A.1, A.3.3

[72] Richard O. Duda and Peter E. Hart. Use of the hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures. Commun. ACM, 15(1):11–15, 1972. A.1, A.3.1, A.3.2

[73] Richard O. Duda and Peter E. Hart. Use of the hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures. Commun. ACM, 15(1):11–15, 1972. A.2.1

[74] Patrick Etyngier, Renaud Keriven, and Jean-Philippe Pons. Projecting onto a shape prior manifold. Technical Report 06-25, CERTIS, Nov 2006.

[75] Patrick Etyngier, Renaud Keriven, and Jean-Philippe Pons. Towards segmentation based on a shape prior manifold. In SSVM’ 07: 1st International Conference on Scale Space and Variational Methods in Computer Vision, Ishia, Italy, May 2007. 3, 1, 7.3.1, 8

[76] Patrick Etyngier, Renaud Keriven, and Florent Ségonne. Projection onto a shape manifold for image segmentation with prior. In ICIP’ 07: 14th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, San Antonio, Texas, USA, Sep 2007. 3, 2, 7.3.1, 8

[77] Patrick Etyngier, Renaud Keriven, and Florent Ségonne. Projection onto manifolds, manifold denoising and applications. Technical Report 07-33, CERTIS, Apr 2007.

[78] Patrick Etyngier, Nikos Paragios, Jean-Yves Audibert, and Renaud Keriven. Radon/hough space for pose estimation. Technical Report 06-22, CERTIS, Jan 2006.

[79] Patrick Etyngier, Nikos Paragios, Renaud Keriven, Yakup Genc, and Jean-Yves Audibert. Radon space and adaboost for pose estimation. In ICPR’ 06: 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Hong-Kong, Aug 2006. A

[80] Patrick Etyngier, Florent Ségonne, and Renaud Keriven. Active-contour based image segmentation using machine learning techniques. In MICCAI’ 07: 10th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, Brisbane, Australia, Oct 2007. 3, 3, 7.3.1, 8

[81] Patrick Etyngier, Florent Ségonne, and Renaud Keriven. Shape priors using manifold learning techniques. In ICCV’ 07: 11th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Oct 2007. 3, 3, 7.3.1, 8

[82] L. C. Evans and J. Spruck. Motion of level sets by mean curvature. ii. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 330(1), Mar 1992. 3.4.2

[83] Y. Fang and D. Geman. Experiments in mental face retrieval. Proceedings AVBPA 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 637–646, July 2005. 6.1.1, 6.2

[84] Olivier Faugeras. Three-dimensional computer vision: a geometric viewpoint. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1993. A.3.1

[85] Olivier Faugeras. Three-dimensional computer vision. A geometric view point. MIT Press, 2003. ISBN : 0-262-06158-9. A.2.1

[86] Herbert Federer. Hausdorff measure and lebesgue area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 37(2):90–94, 1951. 6

[87] Marin Ferecatu, Michel Crucianu, and Nozha Boujemaa. Retrieval of difficult image classes using svd-based relevance feedback. MIR ’04: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGMM international workshop on Multimedia information retrieval, pages 23–30, 2004. 6.1.1, 6.5.3

[88] Céline Fouard and Grégoire Malandain. 3-d chamfer distances and norms in anisotropic grids. Image and Vision Computing, 23(2):143–158, February 2004. 3.2.3

[89] Yoav Freund and Robert E. Schapire. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. In EuroCOLT, pages 23–37, 1995. A.3.2

[90] Yoav Freund and Robert E. Schapire. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In ICML, pages 148–156, 1996. A.3.2

[91] Keinosuke Fukunaga and David R. Olsen. An algorithm for finding intrinsic dimensionality of data. IEEE Transaction on Computers, 20(2):176–183, 1971. 5.5

[92] Taubi Gabriel, Fernando Cukierman, Steve Sullivan, Jean Ponce, and David J. Kriegman. Parameterized families of polynomials for bounded algebraic curve and surface fitting. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 16(3):287–303, 1994. 3.2.3

[93] Charles Galambos, Josef Kittler, and Jiri Matas. Progressive probabilistic hough transform for line detection. In CVPR’99: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1554–1560, 1999. A.2.1

[94] Michael Gashler, Dan Ventura, and Tony Martinez. Iterative non-linear dimensionality reduction with manifold sculpting. In J.C. Platt, D. Koller, Y. Singer, and S. Roweis, editors, NIPS ’08: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20, pages 513–520. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2008. 5.4

[95] Muriel Gastaud, Michel Barlaud, and Gilles Aubert. Combining shape prior and statistical features for active contour segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 14(5):726–734, 2004. 4.4.2

[96] Stuart Geman and Geman Donald. Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions and the bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6:721–741, November 1984. 4.2.2

[97] José Gomes and Olivier D. Faugeras. Reconciling distance functions and level sets. In SCALE-SPACE ’99: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision, pages 70–81, London, UK, 1999. Springer-Verlag. 3.4.2

[98] Leo Grady. Random walks for image segmentation. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(11):1768–1783, 2006. Member-Leo Grady. 4.2.2

[99] Xiaofei He and Partha Niyogi. Locality preserving projections. In Sebastian Thrun, Lawrence Saul, and Bernhard Schölkopf, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2004. 1.1.2, 2.1.2, 5.3

[100] Matthias Hein and Jean-Yves Audibert. Intrinsic dimensionality estimation of submanifolds in rd . In ICML ’05: In the proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Aug 2005. 5.5

[101] Matthias Hein, Jean-Yves Audibert, and Ulrike von Luxburg. From graphs to manifolds - weak and strong pointwise consistency of graph Laplacians. ArXiv Preprint, Journal of Machine Learning Research, forthcoming, 2006. 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.3.3, 5.3.3, 5.3.5

[102] Matthias Hein and Markus Maier. Manifold denoising. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Cambridge, MA, USA, June 2006. MIT Press. 8.1

[103] Paul V.C. Hough. Method and means for recognizing complex patterns, Dec 1962. A.2.1

[104] Y. Ishikawa, R. Subramanya, and C. Faloutsos. Mindreader: query databases through multiple examples. Int’l Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), NY, 1998. 6.1.1

[105] Marcin Iwanowski. Application de la morphologie mathématique pour l’interpolation d’images numériques. PhD thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (ENSMP) / Ecole Polytechnique de Varsovie, November 2000. 3.2.1

[106] Heikki Kälviäinen, Nahum Kiryati, and Satu Alaoutinen. Randomized or probabilistic hough transform: unified performance evaluation, 1999. A.2.1

[107] H. Karcher. Riemannian center of mass and mollifier smoothing. 30(5):509– 541, 1977. 1.3, 3.4.1, 3.4.3

[108] Michael Kass, Andrew Witkin, and Demetri Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active Contour Models. Academic Publishers, 1987. 3.2.2, 4.3.2

[109] John Kaufhold and Anthony Hoogs. Learning to segment images using region-based perceptual features. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 02:954–961, 2004. 4.2.2

[110] Jens Keuchel, Christoph Schnörr, Christian Schellewald, and Daniel Cremers. Binary partitioning, perceptual grouping, and restoration with semidefinite programming. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(11):1364–1379, 2003. 4.2.2

[111] Satyanad Kichenassamy, Arun Kumar, Peter Olver, Allen Tannenbaum, and Anthony J. Yezzi. Conformal curvature flows: from phase transitions to active vision. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 134:275–301, 1996. 4.3.3, 4.3.3

[112] Scott Kirkpatrick, D. Gelatt, Jr., and Mario P. Vecchi. Optimization by simmulated annealing. Science, 220(4598):671–680, 1983. 4.2.2

[113] Nahum Kiryati, Yuval Eldar, and Alfred M. Bruckstein. A probabilistic hough transform. Pattern Recogn., 24(4):303–316, 1991. A.2.1

[114] T. Kurita and T. Kato. Learning of personal visual impression for image database systems. In the proceedings of the international conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 1993. 6.1

[115] James T. Kwok and Ivor W. Tsang. The pre-image problem in kernel methods. In ICML, pages 408–415, 2003. 7.2

[116] Jacques-Olivier Lachaud and Annick Montanvert. Deformable meshes with automated topology changes for coarse-to-fine 3D surface extraction. Medical Image Analysis, 3(2):187–207, 1999. 3.2.2

[117] Stéphane Lafon and Ronald R. Coifman. Diffusion maps. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis : Special issue on Diffusion Maps and Wavelets, 21(1):5–30, July 2006. 1.1.2, 1.3, 1.3, 2.1.2, 2.3, 2.3, 3.4.3, 5.3, 5.3.3, 5.3.5

[118] Stéphane Lafon, Yosi Keller, and Ronald R. Coifman. Data fusion and multicue data matching by diffusion maps. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(11):1784–1797, 2006. 6.3.2, 6.3.2, 6.3.2

[119] Cheolha Pedro Lee. Robust Image Segmentation using Active Contours: Level Set Approaches. PhD thesis, North Carolina State University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, May 2005. 4.3.3

[120] Sung Chung Lee, Soon Ki Jung, and Ramakant Nevatia. Automatic pose estimation of complex 3d building models. In WACV, pages 148–152, 2002. A.3.1

[121] François Leitner and Philippe Cinquin. From splines and snakes to snake splines. In Selected Papers from the Workshop on Geometric Reasoning for Perception and Action, pages 264–281, London, UK, 1993. Springer-Verlag. 3.2.2

[122] Michael E. Leventon, Eric Grimson, and Olivier Faugeras. Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 316–323, 2000. 1.3, 2.3, 3.3.1, 4.4.2, 7.3.3

[123] Elizaveta Levina and Peter J. Bickel. Maximum likelihood estimation of intrinsic dimension. In NIPS ’04: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2004. 5.5

[124] Qiang Li and Y. Xie. Randomized hough transform with error propagation for line and circle detection. Pattern Anal. Appl., 6(1):55–64, 2003. A.2.1

[125] Tony Lindeberg. Edge detection and ridge detection with automatic scale selection. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 30(2):117–156, 1998. 4.1, 4.2.1

[126] Yuncai Liu, Thomas S. Huang, and Olivier Faugeras. Determination of camera location from 2-d to 3-d line and point correspondences. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12(1):28–37, 1990. A.3.1

[127] S.D. MacArthur, C.E. Brodley, and C. Shyu. Relevance feedback decision trees in content-based image retrieval. IEEE Workshop CBAIVL, 2000. 6.1.1

[128] Ravikanth Malladi, James A. Sethian, and Baba C. Vemuri. A topology independent shape modeling scheme. In SPIE Geometric Methods in Computer Vision II, volume 2031, page 246, 1993. 4.3.3, 4.3.3

[129] Tim McInerney and Demetri Terzopoulos. Topology adaptive deformable surfaces for medical image volume segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, pages 840–850, October 1999. 3.2.2, 4.3.2

[130] Tim McInerney and Demetri Terzopoulos. T-snakes: Topology adaptive snakes. Medical Image Analysis, 4(2):73–91, 2000. 3.2.2, 4.3.2

[131] Christophe Meilhac, Matthias Mitschke, and Chahab Nastar. Relevance feedback in surfimage. ACV’98: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, 1998. 6.1.1

[132] Andrea C. G. Mennucci and Anthony Yezzi. Metrics in the space of curves. eprint arXiv:math/0412454, 2004. 3.4.1

[133] James Mercer. Functions of positive and negative type and their connection with the theory of integral equations. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society, 1909. 5.1.2, 5.1.2

[134] Fernand Meyer. Un algorithme optimal de ligne de partage des eaux. In 8e Conférence sur la Reconnaissance des Formes et Intelligence Artificielle, volume 2, pages 847–859, 1992. 4.2.2

[135] Fernand Meyer. Topographic distance and watershed lines. Signal Processing, 38:113–125, 1994. 4.2.2

[136] Fernand Meyer. A morphological interpolation method for mosaic images. In Petros Maragos, Ronald W. Schafer, and Muhammad A. Butt, editors, Mathematical Morphology and its Applications to Image and Signal Processing, pages 337–344, Atlanta, May 1996. Kluwer Academic Press. 3.4.3

[137] François Meyer and Greg Stephens. Locality and low-dimensions in the prediction of natural experience from fmri. In J.C. Platt, D. Koller, Y. Singer, and S. Roweis, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20, pages 1001–1008. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2008. 5.5

[138] Peter W. Michor and David Mumford. Riemannian geometries on spaces of plane curves. J. Eur. Math. Soc., 8:1–48, 2006. 3.1, 3.4.1

[139] Erik G. Miller and Christophe Chefd’hotel. Practical non-parametric density estimation on a transformation group for vision. In CVPR ’03: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 02, page 114, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society. 3.4.2

[140] Thomas P. Minka. Automatic choice of dimensionality for pca. In NIPS ’00: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 598–604, 2000. 5.5

[141] Johan Montagnat, Hervé Delingette, and Nicolas Ayache. A review of deformable surfaces: topology, geometry and deformation. Image and Vision Computing, 19(14):1023–1040, December 2001. 3.2.1

[142] David Mumford and Jayant M. Shah. Boundary detection by minimizing functionals. In IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 1985. 4.1, 4.2.2

[143] David Mumford and Jayant M. Shah. Optimal approximation by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Communication on Pure and Applied Mathemtics, 42:577–685, 1989. 4.2.2

[144] H. Narayanan and M. Belkin. On the relation between low density separation, spectral clustering and graph cuts. Advances on Neural information processing systems NIPS, 2006. 6.2

[145] E.J. Nyström. über die praktische auflösung von linearen integralgleichungen mit anwendungen auf randwertaufgaben der potentialtheorie. Commentationes Physico-Mathematicae, 4(15):1–52, 1928. 1.3, 2.3, 5.3.5

[146] Stanley Osher and Red Fedkiw. Level set methods: an overview and some recent results. Journal of Computational Physics, 169(2):463–502, 2001. 3.2.3, 4.4.2, 8.3.2

[147] Stanley Osher and James A. Sethian. Fronts propagating with curvaturedependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton–Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 79(1):12–49, 1988. 3.2.3, 4.3.3, 4.4.2

[148] Nikos Paragios. Geodesic Active Regions and Level Set Methods: Contribution and Application in Artificial Vision. PhD thesis, INRIA: Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et Automatique, 2000. 4.3.3, 4.3.3

[149] Nikos Paragios and Rachid Deriche. Coupled geodesic active regions for image segmentation: A level set approach. In Sixth European Conference on Computer Vision, volume 2, pages 224–240, 2000. 4.3.3, 4.3.3

[150] Nikos Paragios and Rachid Deriche. Geodesic active regions: A new framework to deal with frame partition problems in computer vision. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation (JVCIR), 13(1/2):249– 268, March 2002. 4.3.3, 4.3.3

[151] Kenneth H. Pearson. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine, 2:559–572, 1901. 1.1.2, 1.3, 2.1.2, 2.3, 5.1.1

[152] Pietro Perona and Jitendra Malik. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence, 12(7):629–639, 1990. 4.1, 4.2.2

[153] Karl W. Pettis, T.A. Bailey, Anil K. Jain, , and Richard C. Dubes. An intrinsic dimensionality estimator from near-neighbor information. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 37:1–25, 1979. 5.5

[154] Thal Quynh Phong, Radu Horaud, Adnan Yassine, and Pham Dinh Tao. Object pose from 2d to 3d point and line correspondences. International Journal of Computer Vision, 15(3):225–243, July 1995. A.1, A.3.3

[155] R.W. Picard, T.P. Minka, and M. Szummer. Modeling user subjectivity in image libraries. In the proceedings of the international conference on Image Processing, 1996. 6.1

[156] Marc Pollefeys. Obtaining 3d models with a hand-held camera/3d modeling from images. Course/Turorial notes http://www.cs.unc.edu/ marc/tutorial/. A.3.1

[157] Jean-Philippe Pons and Jean-Daniel Boissonnat. Delaunay deformable models: Topology-adaptive meshes based on the restricted delaunay triangulation. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Minneapolis, USA, Jun 2007. 3.2.2

[158] Judith M. S. Prewitt. Object enhancement and extraction. Picture Processing and PSchophysics, pages 75–149, 1970. 4.1, 4.2.1

[159] J. Radon. über die bestimmung von funktionen durch ihre integralwerte längs gewisser mannigfaltigkeiten. Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 69:262–277, 1917. A.2.1

[160] Xiaofeng Ren and Jitendra Malik. Learning a classification model for segmentation. In ICCV ’03: Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, page 10, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society. 4.2.2

[161] Lawrence G. Roberts. Machine Perception of Three-Dimensional Solids. Outstanding Dissertations in the Computer Sciences. Garland Publishing, New York, 1963. 4.1, 4.2.1

[162] Sami Romdhani, Shaogang Gong, and Ahaogang Psarrou. A multi-view nonlinear active shape model using kernel pca. In BMVC’ 99: Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, 1999. 4.4.3

[163] Azriel Rosenfeld. Picture Processing by Computer. Academic Press, 1969. A.2.1

[164] Guy Rosman, Alexander M. Bronstein, Michael M. Bronstein, and Ron Kimmel. Manifold analysis by topologically constrained isometric embedding. In MPLR ’06: Proceeding of the Conference on Machine Learning and Pattern Recognition, 2006. 5.4

[165] Mikael Rousson and Nikos Paragios. Shape priors for level set representations. In ECCV’02: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, volume 2, pages 78–92, 2002. 1.3, 2.3, 3.3.1, 4.4.2, 7.3.3

[166] Sam Roweis and Lawrence K. Saul. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science, 290:2323–2326, 2000. 1.1.2, 2.1.2, 5.3, 5.4

[167] Eric Royer, Maxime Lhuillier, Michel Dhome, and Thierry Chateau. Localization in urban environments: Monocular vision compared to a differential gps sensor. In CVPR’05: Proceedins of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 114–121, 2005. A.1, A.3.1

[168] Yong Rui, Thomas S. Huang, and Sharad Mehrotra. Relevance feedback techniques in interactive content-based image retrieval. Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases (SPIE), pages 25–36, 1998. 6.1, 6.1.1, 6.1.2

[169] H. Sahbi. Kernel pca for similarity invariant shape recognition. In the Journal of Neurocomputing, 2006. 6.5.1

[170] Hichem Sahbi, Jean-Yves Audibert, and Renaud Keriven. Graph cut transducers for relevance feedback in content based image retrieval. Certis Research Report, N 07-30, Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussees, February 2007. 6.5.3

[171] Hichem Sahbi, Patrick Etyngier, Jean-Yves Audibert, and Renaud Keriven. Graph laplacian for interactive image retrieval. Technical Report 07-32, CERTIS, Apr 2007.

[172] Hichem Sahbi, Patrick Etyngier, Jean-Yves Audibert, and Renaud Keriven. Graph laplacian for interactive image retrieval. In ICASSP’08: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Las Vegas, April 2008. 6

[173] Hichem Sahbi, Patrick Etyngier, Jean-Yves Audibert, and Renaud Keriven. Manifold learning using robust graph laplacian for interactive image retrieval. In CVPR’08: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Anchorage, June 2008. 6

[174] Philippe Saint-Marc, Hillel Rom, and Gérard Medioni. B-spline contour representation and symmetry detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15(11):1191–1197, 1993. 3.2.2

[175] Robert E. Schapire and Yoram Singer. Improved boosting algorithms using confidence-rated predictions. Machine Learning, 37(3):297–336, 1999. A.3.2, A.8

[176] Thomas Schoenemann and Daniel Cremers. Globally optimal image segmentation with an elastic shape prior. In ICCV’07: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, October 2007. 4.2.2

[177] Thomas Schoenemann and Daniel Cremers. Introducing curvature into globally optimimal image segmentation: Minimum ratio cycles on product graphs. In ICCV’07: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, October 2007. 4.2.2

[178] Greg Schohn and David Cohn. Less is more: Active learning with support vector machines. ICML’00: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 839–846, 2000. 6.1.1

[179] B. Scholkopf, R. Williamson, A. Smola, J.S. Taylor, and J. Platt. Support vector method for novelty detection. Adv. in Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press., 2000. 6.1.1

[180] Bernhard Schölkopf, Alexander J. Smola, and Klaus-Robert Müller. Kernel principal component analysis. In ICANN ’97: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, pages 583–588, London, UK, 1997. Springer-Verlag. 1.1.2, 2.1.2, 5.1.2, 5.1.2

[181] Mathias Seeger. Learning with labeled and unlabeled data. In Technical Report, University of Edinburgh, 2001. 6.1.2

[182] Jean Serra. Hausdorff distances and interpolations. In International Symposium on Mathematical Morphology and its Applications to Image and Signal Processing, pages 107–114, 1998. 3.3.1, 3.4.3

[183] James A. Sethian. Curvature flow and entropy conditions applied to grid generation. J. Comput. Phys., 115(2):440–454, 1994. 3.2.3

[184] James A. Sethian. Fast Marching Methods. SIAM Review, 41:199–235, 1999. 3.2.3

[185] James A. Sethian. Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Sciences. Cambridge Monograph on Applied and Computational Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 1999. 3.2.3, 4.4.2

[186] Dorron Shaked, O. Yaron, and Nahum N. Kiryati. Deriving stopping rules for the probabilistic hough transform by sequential analysis. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 63(3):512–526, 1996. A.2.1

[187] Jianbo Shi and Jitendra Malik. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(8):888– 905, 2000. 4.1, 4.2.2

[188] Ali Kemal Sinop and Leo Grady. Uninitialized, globally optimal, graphbased rectilinear shape segementation — The opposing metrics method. In Proc. of ICCV 2007. IEEE Computer Society, IEEE, Oct. 2007. 4.2.2

[189] Arnold W. M. Smeulders, Marcel Worring, Simone Santini, Amarnath Gupta, and Ramesh Jain. Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(12):1349–1380, 2000. 6.1

[190] Jan Erik Solem. Geodesic curves for analysis of continuous implicit shapes. In ICPR ’06: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pages 852–855, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society. 3.2.1

[191] Jan Erik Solem. Separating rigid motion for continuous shape evolution. In ICPR ’06: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pages 43–46, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society. 3.2.1

[192] Daniel A. Spielman and Shuang-Hua Teng. Spectral partioning works: planar graphs and finite element meshes. In FOCS’ 96: 37th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 96–105. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996. 6.3

[193] Lawrence H. Staib and James S. Duncan. Boundary finding with parametrically deformable models. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 14(11):1061–1075, 1992. 3.2.2

[194] Mark Sussman, Peter Smereka, and Stanley Osher. A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. J. Comput. Phys., 114(1):146–159, 1994. 3.2.3

[195] Andrew Swann and Niels Holm Olsen. Linear transformation groups and shape space. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 19(1):49–62, 2003. 3.4.2

[196] Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Vin de Silva, and John C. Langford. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290(5500):2319–2323, December 2000. 5.2.2, 5.4

[197] Demetri Terzopoulos and Dimitris N. Metaxas. Dynamic 3d models with local and global deformations: Deformable superquadrics. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(7):703–714, 1991. 3.2.2

[198] Édouard Thiel. Géométrie des distances de chanfrein. Université de la Méditerranée, Aix-Marseille 2, Aix-Marseille 2, Déc 2001. http://www.lif-sud.univ-mrs.fr/~thiel/hdr . 3.2.3

[199] K. Tieu and P. Viola. Boosting image retrieval. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2000. 6.1.1

[200] Simon Tong and Edward Chang. Support vector machine active learning for image retrieval. MULTIMEDIA ’01: Proceedings of the ninth ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 107–118, 2001. 6.1, 6.1.1

[201] Warren S. Torgerson. Multidimensional scaling: I. theory and method. Psychometrika, 17:401–419, 1952. 1.1.2, 1.3, 2.1.2, 2.3, 5.2.1, 5.2.1

[202] Warren S. Torgerson. Multidimensional scaling of similarity. Psychometrika, 30:379–393, 1952. 1.3, 2.3, 5.2.1

[203] Andy Tsai, Anthony J. Yezzi, William M. Wells, Clare Tempany, Dewey Tucker, Ayres Fan, W. Eric L. Grimson, and Allan S. Willsky. A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 22(2):137–154, 2003. 1.3, 2.3, 4.4.2

[204] Andy Tsai, Anthony J. Yezzi, Jr., and Allan S. Willsky. Curve evolution implementation of the mumford-shah functional for image segmentation, denoising, interpolation, and magnification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 10(8):1169–1186, August 2001. 4.3.3, 4.3.3

[205] Zhuowen Tu and Song-Chun Zhu. Image segmentation by data-driven markov chain monte carlo. IEEE Transaction Pattern Analysis Machicne Intelligence, 24(5):657–673, 2002. 4.2.2

[206] Carole J. Twining and Christopher J. Taylor. Kernel principal component analysis and the construction of non-linear active shape models. In BMVC’ 01: Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, 2001. 4.4.3

[207] Michael van Ginkel, Cris L. Luengo Hendriks, and Lucas J. van Vliet. A short introduction to the radon and hough transforms and how they relate to each other. Technical Report QI-2004-01, Quantitative Imaging Group, Delft University of Technology, 2004. A.1, A.3.1

[208] Vladimir Vapnik. Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982. A.3.2

[209] N. Vasconcelos and A. Lippman. Learning from user feedback in image retrieval. in Neural Information Processing Systems MIT press, 2000. 6.1.1

[210] Ulrike von Luxburg, Mikhail Belkin, and Olivier Bosquet. Consistency of spectral clustering. Annals of Statistics, 2007. 6.4

[211] Jingbin Wang, Erdan Gu, and Margrit Betke. Mosaicshape: Stochastic region grouping with shape prior. In CVPR ’05: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05) - Volume 1, pages 902–908, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society. 4.2.2

[212] Kilian Q. Weinberger and Lawrence K. Saul. An introduction to nonlinear dimensionality reduction by maximum variance unfolding. In AAAI. AAAI Press, 2006. 5.3, 5.4

[213] Lei Xu and Erkki Oja. Randomized hough transform (rht): basic mechanisms, algorithms and computational complexities. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing (CVGIP), 57(2):131–154, 1993. A.2.1

[214] Anthony J. Yezzi, Andy Tsai, and Allan S. Willsky. A statistical approach to snakes for bimodal and trimodal imagery. In Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 898–903, 1999. 4.3.3, 4.3.3

[215] Laurent Younes. Invariance, déformations et reconnaissance de formes. Mathématiques et Applications. Springer, 2004. 3.4.2

[216] Gale Young and A. S. Householder. A note on multidimensional psychophysical analysis. Psychometrika, 6:331–333, 1941. 1.1.2, 2.1.2, 5.2.1

[217] Zhenyue Zhang and Hongyuan Zha. Principal manifolds and nonlinear dimensionality reduction via tangent space alignment. SIAM: Journal of Scientific Computing, 26(1):313–338, 2004. 5.4

[218] Y. Zhao, Yao Zhao, and Z. Zhu. Relevance feedback based on query refining and feature database updating in cbir system. Signal Processing, Pattern Recognition, and Applications, 2006. 6.1

[219] X.S. Zhou and T.S. Huang. Relevance feedback in image retrieval: A comprehensive review. in IEEE CVPR Workshop on Content-based Access of Image and Video Libraries (CBAIVL), 2006. 6.1, 6.1.1

[220] Song Chun Zhu and Alan L. Yuille. Region competition: Unifying snakes, region growing, and bayes/mdl for multiband image segmentation. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence, 18(9):884– 900, 1996. 4.1, 4.2.2

Table of content

List of Figures 13

1 Introduction 19

1.1 Context - 19

1.1.1 On the image side - 19

1.1.2 On the statistical learning side - 20

1.2 Image segmentation and statistical learning - 22

1.3 Goal and organization of this dissertation - 23

2 Introduction (Version française) 31

2.1 Contexte - 31

2.1.1 L’image comme point de départ - 31

2.1.2 L’apprentissage statistique comme point de départ - 33

2.2 Segmentation d’image et apprentissage statistique - 34

2.3 But et organisation de ce manuscrit - 36

3 Shapes 41

3.1 Basic definitions for shapes - 43

3.2 Shape representations in practice - 44

3.2.1 Introduction - 44

3.2.2 Explicit form - 45

3.2.3 Implicit functions and distance functions - 48

3.3 Shape space, topology and distances - 49

3.3.1 Distances between shapes - 49

3.4 Deformation, shape manifolds & interpolation - 51

3.4.1 Introduction - 51

3.4.2 Shape gradient & Gâteaux derivatives - 51

3.4.3 Shape manifold interpolation - 55

4 Image segmentation 61

4.1 Introduction - 63

4.2 Image segmentation - 63

4.2.1 Edge detection - 63

4.2.2 Region-based / Pixel-grouping methods - 65

4.3 Segmentation with active contours - 70

4.3.1 Introduction - 70

4.3.2 Active contours: Snakes - 70

4.3.3 Within the Level Set framework - 71

4.4 Incorporating shape priors in active contours - 75

4.4.1 Introduction - 75

4.4.2 Learning linear shape priors - 75

4.4.3 Non linear shape priors - 77

5 Dimensionality reduction & manifold learning techniques 79

5.1 Maximum variance based methods - 81

5.1.1 PCA - Principal Component Analysis - 81

5.1.2 KPCA - Kernel Principal Component Analysis - 83

5.2 Distance-based methods - 88

5.2.1 MDS - Multi-Dimensional Scaling - 88

5.2.2 Isomap - 90

5.3 Laplacian-based methods - 92

5.3.1 Dimensionality reduction and Laplace-Beltrami operator on manifolds - 92

5.3.2 Discrete Laplace-Beltrami Operator - 93

5.3.3 Normalization & convergence - 95

5.3.4 LEM - Laplacian Eigenmaps - 96

5.3.5 DFM - Diffusion Maps - 97

5.4 Other manifold learning methods - 101

5.5 Estimating the dimension of the manifold - 102

6 Application of graph Laplacian to Interactive Image Retrieval 105

6.1 Introduction - 107

6.1.1 Related Work - 107

6.1.2 Motivation and Contribution - 108

6.2 Overview of the Search Process - 111

6.3 Graph Laplacian and Relevance Feedback - 113

6.3.1 s-Weighted Transductive Learner - 113

6.3.2 A Robust k-step random walk matrix - 114

6.3.3 Display Model - 116

6.4 Nyström Extension - 118

6.5 Performances - 119

6.5.1 Databases - 119

6.5.2 Benchmarking - 120

6.5.3 Comparison - 121

6.6 Conclusion - 121

7 New points & attracting forces 123

7.1 Out-of-sample problem - 125

7.1.1 Introduction - 125

7.1.2 First approach: embedding regularization - 125

7.1.3 Nyström Extensions - 126

7.2 Pre-image problem - 128

7.3 Attracting forces toward a manifold - 128

7.3.1 Introduction - 128

7.3.2 General assumptions and Delaunay triangulation - 129

7.3.3 Attracting force #1: closest projection - 129

7.3.4 Attracting force #2: same embedding - 132

7.3.5 Attracting force #3: constant embedding - 133

7.4 Conclusion - 135

8 Applications of attracting forces to manifold denoising and image segmentation with priors 139

8.1 Manifold Denoising - 141

8.2 Projections and shapes - 142

8.2.1 Attracting force #1, rectangle shape manifold & fish shape manifold - 143

8.2.2 Attracting force #2, cross shape manifold - 143

8.2.3 Attracting force #3, ventricle shape manifold - 145

8.3 Image segmentation with general non linear shape priors - 146

8.3.1 Fish shapes, attracting force #2 - 146

8.3.2 Surveillance : Cars, attracting force #3 - 146

8.3.3 Bio Medical Imaging : Ventricle Nuclei, attracting force #3 147

9 Conclusion 159

10 Conclusion (Version Française) 161

A Radon/Hough space for pose estimation 165

A.1 Introduction - 168

A.2 Feature detection, matching & tracking - 169

A.2.1 The Hough transform - 169

A.2.2 The Radon transform - 172

A.2.3 Tracking / Matching lines in the Radon space - 173

A.3 Inference from complete Hough/Radon space - 177

A.3.1 Objectives & Problem formulation - 177

A.3.2 3D-2D Line Relation through Boosting - 178

A.3.3 Line Inference & Pose estimation - 182

A.4 Conclusion & Discussion - 186

Bibliography 189

Publications of the author 213

Statistiques de consultation

Repository Staff Only: edit this item

© ParisTech 2007 - Réalisé par RILK.com - Graphisme par Winch Communication